The Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire in Randomized Controlled Trials of Treatment for Ulcerative Colitis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract

PURPOSE: The 32-item Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ-32) is the most frequently used instrument to capture disease-specific quality of life in randomized clinical trials for ulcerative colitis. This review and meta-analysis provides the first synthesis of evidence regarding the sensitivity of IBDQ-32 total and domain scores to treatment efficacy. METHODS: A systematic literature search and risk-of-bias assessment yielded 14 articles that were included in the primary analysis. Treatments were categorized as efficacious if they met the primary efficacy endpoint (which was not the IBDQ-32); otherwise they were categorized as non-efficacious. A continuous measure of treatment efficacy was calculated for each primary efficacy endpoint. Meta-analysis using random-effects models compared standardized mean differences in IBDQ-32 total and domain change scores between target dose and control arms. Meta-regression compared the association between treatment efficacy and these outcomes. RESULTS: Studies with efficacious treatments showed larger mean improvements relative to controls in IBDQ-32 total scores and all 4 domains (Hedges' g range: 0.49 to 0.67; P<0.001 for all). At the same time, patients in studies with non-efficacious treatments showed small and nonsignificant improvements in these outcomes relative to controls (Hedges' g range: 0.05 to 0.23; P>0.09 for all). Meta-regression models showed that the magnitude of treatment efficacy was a positive predictor of these same IBDQ-32 outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: These analyses found that IBDQ-32 scores are sensitive to treatment. The results provided here support the use of the IBDQ-32 to capture treatment benefits on quality of life for patients with ulcerative colitis.