Impact of Robotic Surgery on Residency Training for Herniorrhaphy and Cholecystectomy

13Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Robotic surgery has increased for common general surgery procedures. This study evaluates how robotic use affects the case distributions of herniorrhaphy and cholecystectomy for general surgery residents according to postgraduate year (PGY). We reviewed Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) biliary or hernia cases logged by surgical residents in the academic year 2017-2018. Operative reports were reviewed to compare approaches (robotic, laparoscopic, and open) by resident role and PGY level. Open cholecystectomies were excluded. Overall, 470 hernia and 657 cholecystectomy cases were logged. Hernia repairs were performed robotically in 15.9%, laparoscopically in 9.5%, and open in 74.7%. Cholecystectomies were performed robotically in 16.4% and laparoscopically in 83.6%. Residents were teaching assistants in 1.8% of hernia repairs and 1.5% of cholecystectomies. Distribution of cases by technique and PGY level was significantly different for both procedures, with chief residents performing the majority of robotic cholecystectomies (52.6%, P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kadakia, N., Malek, K., Lee, S. K., Lee, E. J., Burruss, S., Srikureja, D., … Lum, S. S. (2020). Impact of Robotic Surgery on Residency Training for Herniorrhaphy and Cholecystectomy. American Surgeon, 86(10), 1318–1323. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003134820964430

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free