Neurofeedback requires better evidence of efficacy before it should be considered a legitimate treatment for ADHD: What is the evidence for this claim?

H. Edmund Pigott; Rex Cannon

Journal ArticleOPEN ACCESS

Neurofeedback requires better evidence of efficacy before it should be considered a legitimate treatment for ADHD: What is the evidence for this claim?

NeuroRegulation (2014) 1(1) 25-45

DOI: 10.15540/nr.1.1.25

1Citations

6Readers

Abstract

The article reviews the evidence for the claim that neurofeedback lacks sufficient evidence of efficacy and, therefore, cannot be considered a legitimate treatment for ADHD.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pigott, H. E., & Cannon, R. (2014). Neurofeedback requires better evidence of efficacy before it should be considered a legitimate treatment for ADHD: What is the evidence for this claim? NeuroRegulation, 1(1), 25–45. https://doi.org/10.15540/nr.1.1.25

Neurofeedback requires better evidence of efficacy before it should be considered a legitimate treatment for ADHD: What is the evidence for this claim?

Abstract

Author supplied keywords

Cite

Register to see more suggestions