Beyond Alternative Text and tables: Comparative Analysis of Visualization Tools and Accessibility Methods

19Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Modern visualization software and programming libraries have made data visualization construction easier for everyone. However, the extent of accessibility design they support for blind and low-vision people is relatively unknown. It is also unclear how they can improve chart content accessibility beyond conventional alternative text and data tables. To address these issues, we examined the current accessibility features in popular visualization tools, revealing limited support for the standard accessibility methods and scarce support for chart content exploration. Next, we investigate two promising accessibility approaches that provide off-the-shelf solutions for chart content accessibility: structured navigation and conversational interaction. We present a comparative evaluation study and discuss what to consider when incorporating them into visualization tools.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kim, N. W., Ataguba, G., Joyner, S. C., Zhao, C., & Im, H. (2023). Beyond Alternative Text and tables: Comparative Analysis of Visualization Tools and Accessibility Methods. Computer Graphics Forum, 42(3), 323–335. https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.14833

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free