Support vector machine (svm) classification: Comparison of linkage techniques using a clustering-based method for training data selection

28Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Support vectors, which usually compose a subset of training sets, determine the decision function of support vector machine (SVM) classification. Selecting a subset including the support vectors through reducing a large training set is a challenge. This paper examines how different linkage techniques in a clustering-based reduction method affect classification accuracy for semiarid vegetation mapping. The investigated linkage techniques include single, complete, weighted pairgroup average, and unweighted pair-group average. Using a multiple-angle remote sensing data set, there is no loss of SVM accuracy when the original training set is reduced to 21%, 14%, 20%, and 20% for these four linkage techniques, respectively. © 2009 by Bellwether Publishing, Ltd. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Su, L., & Huang, Y. (2009). Support vector machine (svm) classification: Comparison of linkage techniques using a clustering-based method for training data selection. GIScience and Remote Sensing, 46(4), 411–423. https://doi.org/10.2747/1548-1603.46.4.411

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free