Simulation Needs Assessment Project (SNAP): Use of the Borich Model in Undergraduate Medical Education

0Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Manikin-based simulation is widely used in undergraduate medical education to develop clinical reasoning and communication skills. The Borich Needs Assessment Model has been applied in fields such as nursing and global health to identify gaps between perceived importance and performance, but it has not been used to evaluate simulation-based learning in undergraduate medical education. We applied the Borich model to assess student perceptions of competencies developed in an established simulation curriculum and to inform future simulation curriculum development. A cross-sectional survey was administered to first-, second-, and fourth-year medical students at the University of Hawaii John A. Burns School of Medicine. Students rated eight SNAP competencies for importance, self-reported performance, and perceived influence of simulation. Weighted discrepancy scores were calculated using the Borich model. Faculty completed a parallel survey to compare competency prioritization. Among 164 student respondents, all competencies were rated as highly important. The greatest performance and influence gaps were reported for “Apply knowledge covered in the unit or rotation to simulation cases” (MWDS = 1.37 and 1.61, respectively). Priorities varied by student year, and agreement between faculty and student rankings was limited. The findings highlight a perceived gap between simulation curriculum and knowledge application. The Borich model effectively identified performance gaps and can support targeted simulation curriculum refinement.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wong, S., Serikawa, B., Roman, M., Hada, N., Lee-Jayaram, J., & Berg, B. W. (2025). Simulation Needs Assessment Project (SNAP): Use of the Borich Model in Undergraduate Medical Education. International Medical Education, 4(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/ime4040042

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free