What the Past Suggests About When a Diagnostic Label Is Oppressive

2Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Terminology describing transgender and gender diverse identities has evolved over the past 80 years, becoming progressively less pathologizing and less stigmatizing. While transgender health care no longer uses terms such as gender identity disorder or classifies gender dysphoria as a mental health condition, the term gender incongruence continues to be a source of oppression. An all-encompassing term, if one can be found, might be experienced by some as either empowering or abusive. This article draws on historical perspectives to suggest how clinicians might use diagnostic and intervention language that is harmful to patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mumford, K., Fraser, L., & Knudson, G. (2023). What the Past Suggests About When a Diagnostic Label Is Oppressive. AMA Journal of Ethics, 25(6), 446–451. https://doi.org/10.1001/amajethics.2023.446

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free