Punishment to support: The need to align animal control enforcement with the human social justice movement

38Citations
Citations of this article
80Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Due to inherent and systemic biases, animal control policies in the US are over-enforced in low-income communities and communities of color, resulting in worse health outcomes for the pets in these communities. These outcomes are exemplified by higher confiscation, relinquishment, and euthanasia rates, lower return to owner rates, and extended lengths of stay in animal shelters. The Humane Communities framework operationalizes One Health and One Welfare concepts to comprehensively address issues of inequity at both the individual and structural levels to improve animal control policy and outcomes. Person-centered and culturally competent policies and programs that focus resources on addressing root causes of pet health and welfare issues as opposed to an emphasis on code enforcement can create more positive, scalable, and sustainable improvements in human, other animal, and environmental health and welfare outcomes. This shift from punishment-oriented approaches to support-based models of animal control aligns the animal welfare field with the modern human social justice movement.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hawes, S. M., Hupe, T., & Morris, K. N. (2020). Punishment to support: The need to align animal control enforcement with the human social justice movement. Animals, 10(10), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10101902

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free