Abstract
Much of the recent work in action theory can be organized around a set of objections facing the Simple View and other intention-based accounts of intentional action. In this paper, I review three of the most popular objections to the Simple View and argue that all three objections commit a common fallacy. I then draw some more general conclusions about the relationship between intentional action and moral responsibility. © 2011 The Author. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly © 2011 University of Southern California and Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Wasserman, R. (2011, December). Intentional action and the unintentional fallacy. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0114.2011.01410.x
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.