Abstract
In this divorce procedure the plaintiff asks for a shared custody or at least the right to visit their dog, in order to keep contact with the animal. The Judge recognizes that animals are living beings, but still considered personal property (in this case joint property), and that is how they should be claimed, through another specific legal procedure and not in this one. However, the sentence includes a particular vote by one the judges, who defends that the Court should have solved this issue as well.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Oranich, M. (2014). Custodia compartida y régimen de visitas para un animal de compañía. Comentario sobre la Sentencia no 465/14 de la Audiencia Provincial de Barcelona, Sección 12. Derecho Animal. Forum of Animal Law Studies, 5(4), 1. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/da.133
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.