Improving diagnostic performance of kidney allograft rejection with a model combining relative fraction and absolute copies of donor-derived cell-free DNA—Results from 5 independent cohorts

0Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) is a widely used biomarker in kidney transplantation, reported mainly as either a percentage of total cfDNA or copies per milliliter (cp/mL). We hypothesized that combining both metrics into a continuous composite score would reduce false classifications, thus improving the accuracy of rejection diagnosis. We analyzed 443 dd-cfDNA measurements in 361 patients from 5 independent kidney transplant cohorts with both percentage and cp/mL. A random discovery set of 25 biopsy-proven rejections and 26 nonrejections was used to derive a composite score (CM-Score), integrating dd-cfDNA (%) and cp/mL. Diagnostic performance was validated in 81 rejections and 282 nonrejections and compared to 11 published cohorts. For all evaluations, CM-Score was better than dd-cfDNA in cp/mL, which was better than dd-cfDNA in percent. The CM-Score retained a high NPV of 91% (89%-93%), while significantly improving PPV to 81% (72%-89%; P < .0001, prevalence: 25%), compared to published values (weighted average NPV: 90% [89%-92%]; PPV: 54% [50%-57%], N = 6536). Decision curve analysis yielded a significantly higher net benefit for the CM-Score (P < .003). The dd-cfDNA CM-Score is a robust and clinically meaningful tool improving diagnostic accuracy for ruling-out and ruling-in rejection using dd-cfDNA as a stand-alone metric with high potential to improve decision-making in kidney transplantation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Benning, L., Akifova, A., Oellerich, M., Osmanodja, B., Morath, C., Beck, J., … Budde, K. (2026). Improving diagnostic performance of kidney allograft rejection with a model combining relative fraction and absolute copies of donor-derived cell-free DNA—Results from 5 independent cohorts. American Journal of Transplantation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajt.2026.06.004

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free