Pulled fly balls are harder to catch: a game analysis with a machine learning approach

2Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Two hypotheses were tested: (1) the deflecting motion of fly balls caused by aerodynamic effects varies between the pull side and opposite side of the fair territory, and (2) the probability of flyout is lower on the pull side than the opposite side in Japan’s professional baseball games. From all radar-tracking outputs of official games in 2018–2019, fly balls that resulted in outs or base hits were selected for analysis (N = 25,413), and indices representing horizontal and vertical deflecting motions of fly balls were computed and compared between the pull side and opposite side. A machine learning algorithm was used to construct a model to predict the probability of flyout from the kinematic characteristics of fly balls. Flyout zones where the probability of flyout was > 0.6 were computed for a systematically constructed set of fly balls having identical distribution between the pull side and opposite side. The results showed that: (1) most fly balls landing on the opposite side deflected in the same direction whereas the pulled fly balls deflected to either direction, (2) the pulled low fly balls had greater variability in the deflecting motions than the opposite side counterpart, (3) overall probability of flyout of the low fly balls was lower in the pull side (0.41) than the opposite side (0.49), and (4) the flyout zone of an outfielder in the pull side (mean = 698 m2) for low fly balls was smaller than that of the others (≥ 779 m2). The hypotheses were supported. The pulled low fly balls had substantial variations in the direction and magnitude of deflections, which might have reduced the flyout zone on the pull side.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kato, M., & Yanai, T. (2022). Pulled fly balls are harder to catch: a game analysis with a machine learning approach. Sports Engineering, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12283-022-00373-6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free