Quantifying Bone Quality Using Computed Tomography Hounsfield Units in the Mid-sagittal View of the Lumbar Spine

20Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Computed tomography Hounsfield unit (HU) is an alternative tool to the dual energy x-ray absorptiometry scan T-score to quantify the bone quality. DEXA scan can overestimate the bone mineral density. We studied the correlation of the vertebral mid-axial and mid-sagittal HU to the T-score. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the electronic medical records of patients who underwent dual energy x-ray absorptiometry and computed tomography scans within 1 year. Age, sex, mid-axial and mid-sagittal HU, and T-score were collected and statistically analyzed. Results: We identified 100 patients with computed tomography of the L1-L4. There were 80 female and 20 male patients. The average age was 60.25 years (±12.54 years). Nineteen patients were diagnosed with degenerative spine disease. There were 56 patients with a normal T-score, 33 with osteopenia, and 11 with osteoporosis. The average HU for the mid-sagittal view was 163 (±59) for L1, 159 (±62) for L2, 151 (±59) for L3, and 150 (±62) for L4. The mid-axial and mid-sagittal HU were positively correlated to the DEXA T-score (P < 0.001). The HU was 177 (95% CI: 160–194) for normal T-scores, 132 (120–143) for T-scores indicating osteopenia, and 106 (88–124) for T-scores indicating osteoporosis (P < 0.001). Post hoc analysis showed no difference between osteopenia and osteoporosis (P = 0.46). Conclusions: Mid-sagittal HU is positively correlated to the T-score, similar to the mid-axial HU. Therefore, it can be used to acquire a general overview of the bone quality before spinal instrumentation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Elarjani, T., Warner, T., Nguyen, K., Nguyen, S., & Urakov, T. M. (2021). Quantifying Bone Quality Using Computed Tomography Hounsfield Units in the Mid-sagittal View of the Lumbar Spine. World Neurosurgery, 151, e418–e425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2021.04.051

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free