Co-benefits of climate mitigation and health protection in energy systems: Scoping methods

140Citations
Citations of this article
206Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Interventions in the energy sector offer significant opportunities for reducing both greenhouse and other health-damaging pollution, resulting in what are called "co-benefits." The health community plays a critical role in evaluating such interventions to optimize progress of both sorts because both affect health. In detail, analyses require sophisticated modeling and specific local information. As a starting point, however, we offer here a set of scoping methods for obtaining a quick assessment of these co-benefits for interventions in the energy sector, the arena with the highest potential for significant co-benefits. Thus we combine relevant methods developed separately in recent years for cost-effectiveness assessments in the climate change, health, and development communities. We offer sample calculations, which illustrate the apparent high degree of co-benefit effectiveness for targeted interventions in the household energy sector in developing countries. Copyright © 2008 by Annual Reviews. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Smith, K. R., & Haigler, E. (2008). Co-benefits of climate mitigation and health protection in energy systems: Scoping methods. In Annual Review of Public Health (Vol. 29, pp. 11–25). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.29.020907.090759

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free