Abstract
Anyone who has read my book Greek Popular Morality in the Time of Plato and Aristotle (Oxford 1974) (hereafter ‘ GPM ’) and has also read Professor A. W. H. Adkins' book Merit and Responsibility (Oxford 1960) (‘ M&R ’) will have noticed that the two books differ substantially in their approach to the history of Greek moral values and in some of the conclusions which they reach. Adkins' critical review of GPM , entitled ‘Problems in Greek Popular Morality’, CPh lxxiii (1978) 143–58 (‘ Problems ’), explains very clearly why he finds GPM in many respects inadequate or misleading, and it has greatly helped me to understand my own disquiet at the influence exercised by the presuppositions, methods and conclusions of M&R . My purpose in this paper is not to offer a review of M&R twenty years too late, nor to attempt a rebuttal, point by point, of the criticisms of GPM contained in Problems , but to examine one major issue: how should the portrayal of moral evaluation on the tragic stage or in epic narrative be used as evidence for the history of Greek moral values? A very important proposition is stated in M&R 127: ‘A drama is a practical work; it involves action. People appear on the stage and behave as they do in real life.’ With this proposition I agree, subject to three provisos, of which one limits its application and two amplify it. The limiting proviso is obvious.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Dover, K. J. (1983). The portrayal of moral evaluation in Greek poetry. The Journal of Hellenic Studies, 103, 35–48. https://doi.org/10.2307/630527
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.