Reply to Budowle, Ge, Chakraborty and Gill-King: Use of prior odds for missing persons identifications

7Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Prior probabilities represent a core element of the Bayesian probabilistic approach to relatedness testing. This letter opinions on the commentary Use of prior odds for missing persons identifications by Budowle et al., published recently in this journal. Contrary to Budowle et al., we argue that the concept of prior probabilities (i) is not endowed with the notion of objectivity, (ii) is not a case for computation, and (iii) does not require new guidelines edited by the forensic DNA community--as long as probability is properly considered as an expression of personal belief. © 2012 Biedermann et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Biedermann, A., Taroni, F., & Margot, P. (2012, January 31). Reply to Budowle, Ge, Chakraborty and Gill-King: Use of prior odds for missing persons identifications. Investigative Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1186/2041-2223-3-2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free