Theory and explanation in geography revisited: Mid-range causal theories and explanatory conjuncturalism

7Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This commentary takes on Jamie Peck’s conjunctural methodologies and reflects on the epistemological matter of theory and explanation in geography. Mapping onto several key elements of conjunctural analysis, I reframe its methodological examination in relation to mid-level concepts and theories (i.e. mid-range theory), the articulation of causality and causal co-determination (i.e. causal mechanisms), and situational analysis, historicisation, and thick theorisation as context-rich explanation (i.e. context-specificity). By way of a sympathetic critique, I focus on two potential ‘blind spots’ that might require further rethinking and perhaps remedies: the underdevelopment of practical adequacy and the role of normative theorising in conjunctural methodologies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yeung, H. W. chung. (2024, November 1). Theory and explanation in geography revisited: Mid-range causal theories and explanatory conjuncturalism. Dialogues in Human Geography. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1177/20438206231177074

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free