Making Sense of Sustainability: How Institutional Design Can Sustain Informal Savings and Credit Groups*

0Citations
Citations of this article
53Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A majority of people in developing countries lack access to formal finance and rely on community-organised groups. These savings and credit associations (SCAs) face challenges in overcoming well-known collective action problems. SCA financial products can be understood as a common pool resource. Drawing on Ostrom’s (1990) design principles for self-governing local institutions, we investigate the conditions under which SCAs can achieve sustainability. Using a qualitative methodology, data were collected by examining administrative records and interviewing stakeholders from three SCAs in the Philippines. Our results indicate that adherence to the design principles is positively associated with SCA sustainability. We find that pre-existing social connections are not a necessary condition for initial adherence to the design principles but social capital may play an important role in sustainability overall. These findings contribute to our understanding of how governance design can boost the sustainability of informal groups and enhance financial inclusion among the poor.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tan, S., & Savani, M. M. (2022). Making Sense of Sustainability: How Institutional Design Can Sustain Informal Savings and Credit Groups*. International Journal of Community and Social Development, 4(2), 152–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/25166026221085085

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free