Abstract
Complex questions that require inferencing and synthesizing information from multiple documents can be seen as a kind of topicoriented, informative multi-document summarization. In this paper, we have experimented with one empirical and two unsupervised statistical machine learning techniques: k-means and Expectation Maximization (EM), for computing relative importance of the sentences. However, the performance of these approaches depends entirely on the feature set used and the weighting of these features. We extracted different kinds of features (i.e. lexical, lexical semantic, cosine similarity, basic element, tree kernel based syntactic and shallow-semantic) for each of the document sentences in order to measure its importance and relevancy to the user query. We used a local search technique to learn the weights of the features. For all our methods of generating summaries, we have shown the effects of syntactic and shallow-semantic features over the bag of words (BOW) features. © 2008 Association for Computational Linguistics.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Chali, Y., & Joty, S. R. (2008). Selecting sentences for answering complex questions. In EMNLP 2008 - 2008 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Proceedings of the Conference: A Meeting of SIGDAT, a Special Interest Group of the ACL (pp. 304–313). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.3115/1613715.1613757
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.