Abstract
In his article, "Saving Critical Realism," Harre (2009) relates his revised philosophy of science to a social philosophy concerning the nature of society, and to a political philosophy regarding the nature of freedom and reform. I argue that his social philosophy and political philosophy rest upon an individualistic sense of society and freedom. I demonstrate that his individualism is factually and politically untenable. (I shall not comment on his philosophy of science, although the errors in his social and political philosophies make it suspect.) I counterpose an alternative social philosophy and political philosophy that are based on a structural model of society, freedom, and social change. My critique demonstrates how social science can adjudicate claims of structuralist vs. individualist social and political philosophy. It also argues that social science must constitute the basis for formulating political ideals of freedom and social organization if these are to be viable. © 2009 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Ratner, C. (2009). Harre’s social philosophy and political philosophy: A social scientific critique. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 39(4), 448–465. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.2009.00415.x
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.