Abstract
Most infonnallogic texts and articles assume a verbal account of reasoning which defines "argument" as a set of sentences. The present paper broadens this definition in order to account for "visual arguments" which are communicated with nonverbal visual images. Standard approaches to verbal arguments are extended in a way that allows them to explain and evaluate visual argumentation.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
APA
Groarke, L. (1996). Logic, Art and Argument. Informal Logic, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v18i2.2376
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.
Already have an account? Sign in
Sign up for free