Logic, Art and Argument

  • Groarke L
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Most infonnallogic texts and articles assume a verbal account of reasoning which defines "argument" as a set of sentences. The present paper broadens this definition in order to account for "visual arguments" which are communicated with nonverbal visual images. Standard approaches to verbal arguments are extended in a way that allows them to explain and evaluate visual argumentation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Groarke, L. (1996). Logic, Art and Argument. Informal Logic, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v18i2.2376

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free