Surgical Treatment of Adhesive Capsulitis: A Retrospective Comparative Study of Manipulation Under Anesthesia and/or Capsular Release

Abstract

Background No consensus exists among orthopedic surgeons regarding the optimal intervention for adhesive capsulitis. The purpose of this study was to determine which treatment provides the best objective outcome following manipulation under anesthesia (MUA), MUA + arthroscopic capsular release (CR), or CR alone. Methods Between 2011 and 2015, 97 shoulders were treated for adhesive capsulitis (MUA, MUA+CR, CR) and followed for three months or until achieving full range of motion (ROM). Patients' charts were reviewed for demographic information, diabetes, pre/post-operative ROM, and complications. Results The average age at surgery was 57 years (range: 31-80 years) with a mean follow-up of 6.2 months (range: 2-43 months). ROM improved significantly regardless of treatment modality (p < 0.001). MUA had significantly more external rotation at follow-up than MUA+CR and CR alone (62 vs 49 vs 48, p = 0.02). Groups were similar in regards to post-operative elevation and internal rotation. Loss of external rotation following surgery was significantly more common in the MUA+CR group (p = 0.03). In diabetics, no treatment option was superior to another in regards to final ROM. Conclusion Operative treatment of idiopathic adhesive capsulitis is efficacious and safe for improving shoulder ROM across treatment modalities. Surgeon preference may effectively guide treatment independent of diabetic status.