Pressure oscillation amplitude after interruption of tidal breathing as an index of change in airway mechanics in preschool children

13Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Bronchodilator reversibility testing using change in airway resistance during interruption (Rint) is feasible in preschool children. Analysis of postocclusion oscillations of the mouth pressure-time transient (Pmo(t)), recorded during airflow interruption, may offer an alternative index of change in airway mechanics. We analyzed Pmo(t) oscillation amplitude in three different ways: 1) difference between the first relative maximum and minimum (AMxMn); 2) detection of the dominant frequency using Fourier analysis (AFS); and 3) curve-fitting based on a mathematical model (ACurv). In 25 asymptomatic asthmatic children, aged 2.5-5.6 years, who had undertaken reversibility testing, the correlation coefficients between baseline Rint and amplitude were: AMxMn r = -0.84, AFS r = -0.82, ACurv r = -0.84. The coefficient of variation (CoV) of readings contributing to baseline Rint measurement, as median (range), was 12% (5-24%), which was not significantly different from AFS or ACurv (P > 0.05). All parameters were significantly different postbronchodilator (P < 0.001). Using the sensitivity index, i.e., the change after intervention divided by the baseline standard deviation, ACurv was the most sensitive and Rint the least sensitive, with median (range) at 2.72 (-0.84 to 12.10) and 1.91 (-1.17 to 9.50), respectively (P = 0.005). Our results suggest that oscillation amplitude analysis may provide a sensitive index of change in airway mechanics in preschool children undertaking bronchodilator reversibility testing. © 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bridge, P. D., Wertheim, D., Jackson, A. C., & McKenzie, S. A. (2005). Pressure oscillation amplitude after interruption of tidal breathing as an index of change in airway mechanics in preschool children. Pediatric Pulmonology, 40(5), 420–425. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.20267

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free