Prevalence of AmpC over-expression in bloodstream isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa

46Citations
Citations of this article
54Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study examined the contribution of AmpC over-expression to β-lactam resistance in clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa obtained from a hospital in Houston, TX, USA. Seventy-six non-repeat bloodstream isolates obtained during 2003 were screened for ceftazidime resistance in the presence and absence of clavulanic acid 4mg/L. AmpC was identified by isoelectric focusing (with and without cloxacillin inhibition); stable derepression was ascertained phenotypically by a spectrophotometric assay (with and without preceding induction by imipenem) using nitrocefin as the substrate, and was confirmed subsequently by quantitative RT-PCR of the ampC gene. The clonal relatedness of the AmpC-over-expressing isolates was assessed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. In addition, the ampC and ampR gene sequences were determined by PCR and sequencing. For comparison, two standard wild-type strains (PAO1 and ATCC27853) and three multidrug-susceptible isolates were used as controls. AmpC over-expression was confirmed in 14 ceftazidime-resistant isolates (overall prevalence rate, 18.4%), belonging to seven distinct clones. The most prevalent point mutations in ampC were G27D, V205L and G391A. Point mutations in ampR were also detected in eight ceftazidime-resistant isolates. AmpC over-expression appears to be a significant mechanism of β-lactam resistance in P. aeruginosa. Understanding the prevalence and mechanisms of β-lactam resistance in P. aeruginosa may guide the choice of empirical therapy for nosocomial infections in hospitals. © 2007 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tam, V. H., Schilling, A. N., LaRocco, M. T., Gentry, L. O., Lolans, K., Quinn, J. P., & Garey, K. W. (2007). Prevalence of AmpC over-expression in bloodstream isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Clinical Microbiology and Infection, 13(4), 413–418. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-0691.2006.01674.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free