Ambiguous authorship and uncertain authenticity: A cataloger’s dilemma

8Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Cataloging works whose authorship is unclear or whose authenticity is in question is a long-standing issue that presents a unique challenge to the cataloger. AACR2R provides detailed guidance for determining the main entry heading, and the Subject Cataloging Manual includes instructions for the use of subdivisions; however, they are of limited assistance when dealing with ambiguous works. This article looks at some recent works that have generated controversy in their respective disciplines, and discusses the ideological and ethical implications of cataloging decisions made for them. Suggestions for cataloging these uncommon but vexing works include using notes that reflect the principles stated in the “Library Bill of Rights,” and rethinking our use of reference sources. [Article copies available for a fee from The Haworth Document Delivery Service: 1-800-HAWORTH. E-mail address: Website: ©2002 by The Haworth Press, Inc. All rights reserved.]. © 2002 Taylor and Francis Group, LLC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Brubaker, J. (2002). Ambiguous authorship and uncertain authenticity: A cataloger’s dilemma. Cataloging and Classification Quarterly, 34(4), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1300/J104v34n04_04

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free