Further evaluation of the factor structure, prevalence, and concurrent validity of DSM-5 criteria for Persistent Complex Bereavement Disorder and ICD-11 criteria for Prolonged Grief Disorder

55Citations
Citations of this article
84Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Persistent complex bereavement disorder (PCBD) is a disorder of grief included in DSM-5. Prolonged grief disorder (PGD) is included in ICD-11. Few studies have evaluated and compared criteria sets for DSM-5 PCBD and ICD-11 PGD. The current study explored and compared the dimensionality, prevalence rates, diagnostic agreement, concurrent validity, and socio-demographic and loss-related correlates of both criteria sets. Self-reported data were available from 551 bereaved individuals. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that for DSM-5 PCBD-symptoms, a three-factor model with distinct but correlated factors fit the data well; for ICD-11 PGD-symptoms a one-factor model yielded adequate fit. The prevalence of probable DSM-5 PCBD (8.2%) was significantly lower than ICD-11 PGD (19.2%). Both DSM-5 PCBD and ICD-11 PGD were significantly associated with concurrent overall grief and depression, and varied as a function of education and time since loss. ICD-11 PGD prevalence rates went down and agreement with PCBD-caseness went up, when heightening the number of symptoms required for an ICD-11 PGD diagnosis. This study was limited by its reliance on self-reported data and grief symptoms were derived from two scales. That notwithstanding, findings provide further evidence that differences exist between disturbed grief criteria in DSM-5 and ICD-11 that may negatively impact research and care.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Boelen, P. A., Lenferink, L. I. M., & Smid, G. E. (2019). Further evaluation of the factor structure, prevalence, and concurrent validity of DSM-5 criteria for Persistent Complex Bereavement Disorder and ICD-11 criteria for Prolonged Grief Disorder. Psychiatry Research, 273, 206–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2019.01.006

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free