Management of asthma in Australian general practice: Care is still not in line with clinical practice guidelines

37Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective and Background: We investigated the quality of primary care asthma management in a sample of Australian general practices. Methods: 247 general practitioners (GPs) from 97 practices completed a structured interview about management of asthma, diabetes and hypertension/heart disease. A further structured interview with the senior practice principal and practice manager was used to collect information about practice capacity for chronic disease management. Results: Just under half of GPs (47%) had access to an asthma register and the majority (76%) had access to spirometry in their practice. In terms of routine management of asthma, 12% of GPs reported using spirometry routinely, 13% routinely reviewed written asthma action plans, 27% routinely provided education about trigger factors, 30% routinely reviewed inhaler technique, 24% routinely assessed asthma severity, and 29% routinely assessed physical activity. Practice characteristics such as practice size (p=1.0) and locality (rural/metropolitan) (p=0.7) did not predict quality of asthma management nor did indicators of practice capacity including Business maturity, IT/IM maturity, Multidisciplinary teamwork, and Clinical linkages. Conclusion: Gaps remain in the provision of evidence-based care for patients with asthma in general practice. Markers of practice capacity measured here were not associated with guideline-based respiratory care within practices. © 2009 General Practice Airways Group. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Barton, C., Proudfoot, J., Amoroso, C., Ramsay, E., Holton, C., Bubner, T., … Beilby, J. (2009). Management of asthma in Australian general practice: Care is still not in line with clinical practice guidelines. Primary Care Respiratory Journal, 18(2), 100–105. https://doi.org/10.3132/pcrj.2008.00059

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free