Cementless revision for infected total hip replacements

25Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Our aim was to determine the success rate of repeated debridement and two-stage cementless revision arthroplasty according to the type of infected total hip replacement (THR). We enrolled 294 patients (294 hips) with an infected THR in the study. There were 222 men and 72 women with a mean age of 55.1 years (24.0 to 78.0). The rate of control of infection after the initial treatment and after repeated debridement and two-stage revisions was determined. The clinical (Harris hip score) and radiological results were evaluated. The mean follow-up was 10.4 years (5.0 to 14.0). The eventual rate of control of infection was 100.0% for early superficial post-operative infection, 98.4% for early deep post-operative infection, 98.5% for late chronic infection and 91.0% for acute haematogenous infection. Overall, 288 patients (98%) maintained a functioning THR at the latest follow-up. All the allografts appeared to be united and there were no failures. These techniques effectively controlled infection and maintained a functional THR with firm fixation in most patients. Repeated debridement and two-stage or repeated two-stage revisions further improved the rate of control of infection after the initial treatment and increased the likelihood of maintaining a functional THR. ©2011 British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kim, Y. H., Kim, J. S., Park, J. W., & Joo, J. H. (2011). Cementless revision for infected total hip replacements. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B, 93 B(1), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.93B1.25120

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free