The Impact of Restricting Sleep Duration on Physical Activity: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Crossover Study

4Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objectives: This study investigated the causal impact of sleep durations on participants’ physical activity (PA) in real-world conditions. Method: We performed a secondary analysis of PA data from 146 young adults using a randomized crossover design: both restricted (5–6 hr/night) and well-rested (8–9 hr/night) sleep weeks were assessed, with a washout week in between. Sleep and activity were tracked via research-grade actigraphy. Data analysis of PA involved repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) and regression techniques. Results: Analysis plans and hypothesis were preregistered before data analysis. The exogenously assigned sleep restriction (SR) treatment reduced nightly sleep an average of 92.65 min (+40.44 min) compared to one’s wellrested sleep treatment. The impact of SR on PA was substantial, leading to a 7% reduction in average hourly PA: 18,081.2 (well-rested) versus 16,818.2 (restricted sleep). Significant findings were revealed in daily, F(1, 6) = 84.37, p,.001, ηp2 = 0.934, and hourly comparisons, F(1, 166) = 30.47, p,.001, ηp2 = 0.155. Further, sensitivity analysis using a variety of regression specifications also found that exogenously assigned SR decreased average wake-hour activity counts by approximately 4.4%–4.7% (p,.01 in all cases) when controlling for other factors. Exploratory analysis showed the PA effects of SR manifested via reductions in PA intensity with concurrent increases in the proportion of time considered as sedentary. Conclusions: SR significantly lowered PA by around 7%, characterized by reduced intensity and elevated sedentary behavior in a naturalistic setting.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

McElroy, T., Dickinson, D. L., & Vale, S. (2024). The Impact of Restricting Sleep Duration on Physical Activity: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Crossover Study. Health Psychology, 43(8), 561–569. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0001360

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free