Body mass index and risk of Parkinson's disease: A dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies

65Citations
Citations of this article
76Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: A number of epidemiologic studies examining the relationship between body mass index (BMI) and the future occurrence of Parkinson's disease (PD) reported largely inconsistent findings. We conducted a dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies to clarify this association. Methods: Eligible prospective studies were identified by a search of PubMed and by checking the references of related publications. The generalized least squares trend estimation was employed to compute study-specific relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for an increase in BMI of 5 kg/m 2, and the random-effects model was used to compute summary RR and 95% CI. Results: A total of 10 prospective studies were included in the final analysis. An increase in BMI of 5 kg/m 2 was not associated with PD risk, with a summary RR of 1.00 (95% CI = 0.89-1.12). Results of subgroup analysis found similar results except for a week positive association in studies that adjusted for alcohol consumption (RR = 1.13, 95% CI = 0.99-1.29), and a week inverse association in studies that did not (RR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.78-1.04). In a separate meta-analysis, no significant association between overweight (25 kg/m 2 ≤ BMI ≤29.9 kg/m 2), obesity (BMI≥30 kg/m 2) or excess weight (BMI≥25 kg/m 2) and PD risk was observed. Conclusion: This meta-analysis does not support the notion that higher BMI materially increases PD risk. However, a week positive BMI-PD association that may be masked by confounders still cannot be excluded, and future prospective studies with a good control for potential confounding factors are needed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wang, Y. L., Wang, Y. T., Li, J. F., Zhang, Y. Z., Yin, H. L., & Han, B. (2015). Body mass index and risk of Parkinson’s disease: A dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies. PLoS ONE, 10(6). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131778

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free