Visualising violence: Legitimacy and authority in the ‘war on terror’

64Citations
Citations of this article
53Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This paper explores the relationship between visual representation and claims to legitimacy in the current George W. Bush administration's ‘war on terror’. Drawing on discourse theoretical works that focus analytical attention on the power of visual representation in communicating authority and legitimacy, this paper argues that crucial to such communicative acts is the rendering of a receptive audience complicit in particular interpretations of the images in question. While various visual representations construct political subjectivity and agency in different ways, common to all interpretations is the centralisation of an authoritative narrative. It is argued that this authorial voice must be challenged in the formulation of a politics resistant to dominant discourses of security/counter-terrorism in the West. © 2008, Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shepherd, L. J. (2008). Visualising violence: Legitimacy and authority in the ‘war on terror.’ Critical Studies on Terrorism. https://doi.org/10.1080/17539150802184611

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free