Comparison of 2.4 ghz wifi ftm-and rssi-based indoor positioning methods in realistic scenarios

70Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

With the addition of the Fine Timing Measurement (FTM) protocol in IEEE 802.11-2016, a promising sensor for smartphone-based indoor positioning systems was introduced. FTM enables a Wi-Fi device to estimate the distance to a second device based on the propagation time of the signal. Recently, FTM has gotten more attention from the scientific community as more compatible devices become available. Due to the claimed robustness and accuracy, FTM is a promising addition to the often used Received Signal Strength Indication (RSSI). In this work, we evaluate FTM on the 2.4 GHz band with 20 MHz channel bandwidth in the context of realistic indoor positioning scenarios. For this purpose, we deploy a least-squares estimation method, a probabilistic positioning approach and a simplistic particle filter implementation. Each method is evaluated using FTM and RSSI separately to show the difference of the techniques. Our results show that, although FTM achieves smaller positioning errors compared to RSSI, its error behavior is similar to RSSI. Furthermore, we demonstrate that an empirically optimized correction value for FTM is required to account for the environment. This correction value can reduce the positioning error significantly.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bullmann, M., Fetzer, T., Ebner, F., Ebner, M., Deinzer, F., & Grzegorzek, M. (2020). Comparison of 2.4 ghz wifi ftm-and rssi-based indoor positioning methods in realistic scenarios. Sensors (Switzerland), 20(16), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20164515

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free