Retrograde Approach via Ipsilateral Septal Collateral Channel in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Coronary Chronic Total Occlusion: A Single-Center Experience

3Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: The septal collateral channel (CC) is the preferred channel in retrograde percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic total occlusion (CTO). However, reports on the utilization of the ipsilateral septal CC are limited. Objective: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of the ipsilateral septal CC in retrograde CTO PCI. Methods: Twenty-five patients with successful wire CC tracking via the ipsilateral septal CC in retrograde CTO PCI were retrospectively analyzed. All procedures were performed by experienced CTO operators. Procedures were divided into the left descending coronary artery (LAD)-septal-LAD group and the LAD-septal-left circumflex coronary artery (LCX) group. Procedural complications and in-hospital outcomes were ascertained. Results: Both groups were similar with respect to risk factors and angiographic characteristics of the CTO, except for the collateral tortuosity (86.7% vs 20%, p=0.002). The success rate of microcatheter CC tracking was 96%. Both technical success and procedural success rates were 92%. Procedural complications were found in one case (septal perforation, 4%), which happened in the LAD-septal-LAD group (p=0.250). One postoperative adverse event (Q-wave myocardial infarction, 4%) was observed before discharge. Conclusion: The retrograde approach via the ipsilateral septal CC was feasible, with high success rates and acceptable complications, in the hands of experienced operators.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Deng, X., Zhong, X., Nie, B., Wang, R., Lu, H., Ge, L., … Ge, J. (2023). Retrograde Approach via Ipsilateral Septal Collateral Channel in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Coronary Chronic Total Occlusion: A Single-Center Experience. Clinical Interventions in Aging, 18, 933–940. https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S404818

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free