Modeling 1-year Relapse-free Survival After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Radical Cystectomy in Patients with Clinical T2–4N0M0 Urothelial Bladder Carcinoma: Endpoints for Phase 2 Trials

12Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Several ongoing phase 2 trials are evaluating new neoadjuvant therapy regimens in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). The 1-yr recurrence-free survival (RFS) after radical cystectomy (RC), with or without perioperative chemotherapy, can be used to model statistical assumptions and interpret outcomes from these studies. Objective: To provide a benchmark for predicting 1-yr RFS in patients with cT2–4N0 MIBC. Design, setting, and participants: We identified 950 patients with clinical stage T2–4N0 MIBC undergoing RC at 27 centers between 1990 and 2016. We assessed 1-yr RFS rates for patients managed with no perioperative chemotherapy, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), adjuvant chemotherapy (AC), or NAC followed by AC. Cox regression analyses tested for 1-yr postsurgical RFS predictors. A Cox-based nomogram was developed to estimate 1-yr RFS and its accuracy was assessed in terms of Harrell's c-index, a calibration plot, and decision curve analysis. We report 1-yr RFS rates across the nomogram tertiles. Results and limitations: The 1-yr RFS rates were 67.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 64–72) after no perioperative chemotherapy, 76.9% (95% CI 72–83%) after NAC, 77.8% (95% CI 71–85%) after AC, and 57% (95% CI 37–87) after NAC + AC. On multivariable analysis, positive surgical margins (p = 0.002), pT stage (p < 0.0001), and pN stage (p

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bandini, M., Briganti, A., Plimack, E. R., Niegisch, G., Yu, E. Y., Bamias, A., … Necchi, A. (2019). Modeling 1-year Relapse-free Survival After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Radical Cystectomy in Patients with Clinical T2–4N0M0 Urothelial Bladder Carcinoma: Endpoints for Phase 2 Trials. European Urology Oncology, 2(3), 248–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2018.08.009

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free