Corrigendum: Defeat, Entrapment, and Positive Future Thinking: Examining Key Theoretical Predictors of Suicidal Ideation Among Adolescents (Front. Psychol., (2021), 12, 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.590388)

4Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In the original article, there were mistakes in the legends for Figures 2 and 3 as published. The figure legends incorrectly stated that greater and lower levels of positive future thinking (Figure 2) were defined at −1 SD and +1 SD, respectively; and that more vs. less realistic positive future thinking levels were defined at+1 SDand−1 SD, respectively (Figure 3). In fact, it was the opposite. Additionally, the text of the original article also incorrectly stated that higher and lower levels of positive future thinking, and higher and lower levels of unrealistic positive future thinking, were probed at −1 SD below and +1 SD above the mean, respectively. In fact, it was the opposite: higher positive and higher unrealistic future thinking were probed at +1 SD above the mean, and lower positive and lower unrealistic future thinking were probed at −1 SD below the mean. The authors apologize for these errors in reporting and state that they do not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pollak, O. H., Guzmán, E. M., Shin, K. E., & Cha, C. B. (2021, September 16). Corrigendum: Defeat, Entrapment, and Positive Future Thinking: Examining Key Theoretical Predictors of Suicidal Ideation Among Adolescents (Front. Psychol., (2021), 12, 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.590388). Frontiers in Psychology. Frontiers Media S.A. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.741504

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free