Can pacing self-management alter physical behavior and symptom severity in chronic fatigue syndrome? A case series

33Citations
Citations of this article
108Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Given the lack of evidence in support of pacing self-management for patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), we examined whether physical behavior and health status of patients with CFS would improve in response to a pacing self-management program. We performed an observational study of pacing self-management in seven CFS patients using a single-case study design. Stages A1 and A2 (7-day assessment periods) of the A1-B-A2 design corresponded to the baseline and posttreatment measurements of physical behavior (real-time activity monitoring) and health status (self-reported measures), respectively. Stage B (3 weeks of treatment) consisted of three individual treatment sessions of pacing self-management. When comparing pre- versus posttreatment data, we found that the patients' ability to perform daily activities and the severity of their symptom complexes were improved (p = 0.043). Concentration difficulties, mood swings, muscle weakness, and intolerance to bright light improved as well. A statistically significant decrease in the mean time spent doing light activity (<3 metabolic equivalents) was observed, but a change in the way physical activity was spread throughout the day was not. We found that 3 weeks of pacing self-management was accompanied by a modest improvement in symptom severity and daily functioning. The outcome of the present study calls for a randomized controlled clinical trial to examine the effectiveness of pacing self-management for people with CFS.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nijs, J., Van Eupen, I., Vandecauter, J., Augustinus, E., Bleyen, G., Moorkens, G., & Meeus, M. (2009). Can pacing self-management alter physical behavior and symptom severity in chronic fatigue syndrome? A case series. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 46(7), 985–996. https://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2009.01.0007

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free