Abstract
This essay contends that emotions provide an extralegal framework that can contribute to a better comprehension of international legal justice and the ways in which it works. The examination of two cases brought before the International Criminal Court (ICC)—namely Ongwen (ICC-02/04-01/15) and Al Mahdi (ICC-01/12-01/15)—identifies how the parties in the process attempt to harness the power of emotion in their pleadings and arguments. This examination fosters a better understanding of the dramatic nature of international trials.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Buis, E. J. (2020). Symposium on art, aesthetics, and international Justice. Aristotle in the Hague: Artistic pleading and emotional theatricality in international criminal proceedings. In AJIL Unbound (Vol. 114, pp. 133–137). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/aju.2020.21
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.