Modeling the cost-effectiveness of the integrated disease surveillance and response (IDSR) system: Meningitis in Burkina Faso

15Citations
Citations of this article
90Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Effective surveillance for infectious diseases is an essential component of public health. There are few studies estimating the cost-effectiveness of starting or improving disease surveillance. We present a cost-effectiveness analysis the Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response (IDSR) strategy in Africa. Methodology/Principal Findings: To assess the impact of the IDSR in Africa, we used pre- and post- IDSR meningococcal meningitis surveillance data from Burkina Faso (1996-2002 and 2003-2007). IDSR implementation was correlated with a median reduction of 2 weeks to peak of outbreaks (25th percentile 1 week; 75th percentile 4 weeks). IDSR was also correlated with a reduction of 43 meningitis cases per 100,000 (25th-40: 75th-129). Assuming the correlations between reductions in time to peak of outbreaks and cases are related, the cost-effectiveness of IDSR was $23 per case averted (25th-$30; 75th - cost saving), and $98 per meningitis-related death averted (25th-$140: 75th - cost saving). Conclusions/Significance: We cannot absolutely claim that the measured differences were due to IDSR. We believe, however, that it is reasonable to claim that IDSR can improve the cost-effectiveness of public health surveillance.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Somda, Z. C., Perry, H. N., Messonnier, N. R., Djingarey, M. H., Ki, S. O., & Meltzer, M. I. (2010). Modeling the cost-effectiveness of the integrated disease surveillance and response (IDSR) system: Meningitis in Burkina Faso. PLoS ONE, 5(9). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013044

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free