Levinthal's question revisited, and answered

55Citations
Citations of this article
73Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Attempts to answer the Levinthal question "How proteins fold to give such a unique structure" are discussed. In the first part of this article, we focus on a few reasons as to why the solution to the protein-folding problem (PFP) has been elusive for a very long time. One is a result of the misinterpretation of Anfinsen's Thermodynamic hypothesis which led to the conclusion that the native structure of a protein must be at a global minimum of the Gibbs energy. The second is the result of the adherence to the hydrophobic paradigm, and at the same time ignoring a whole repertoire of hydrophilic effects. It is argued that switching from a target-based to a caused-based approach, and adopting the hydrophilic paradigm leads straightforwardly to a simple answer to Levinthal's question, as well as to a solution of the PFP. Copyright © 2012 Taylor & Francis.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ben-Naim, A. (2012). Levinthal’s question revisited, and answered. Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics. https://doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2012.674286

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free