Development and comparison of analytical methods for measuring simazine herbicide using gas chromatography/ion trap, gas chromatography/mass selective detector, and high performance liquid chromatography/triple quadrupole mass spectrometers

4Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Simazine is widely used to manage weed growth in the agricultural and industrial fields. Three analytical methods, including gas chromatography (GC)/ion-trap (IT), GC/mass selective detector (MSD), and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)/triple quadrupole mass spectrometers (HPLC/MS/MS), were developed and compared for simazine quantification. The spike recoveries by GC/IT, GC/MSD, and HPLC/MS/MS were 100, 117, and 82.5%, respectively. Different spike recovery depending on analytical methods could be due to matrix effect, different instrumental sensitivity, losses during sample preparation or all of the above. The limit of detection was 0.0361, 0.0263, and 0.0013 mg/kg by GC/IT, GC/MSD, and HPLC/MS/MS, respectively. The HPLC/MS/MS with a positive atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI) ionization mode was the most rapid (7 min), sensitive (limit of detection: 0.0013 mg/kg, limit of quantification: 0.0042 mg/kg), and precise (relative standard deviation: 0.5%) method for simazine quantification.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chung, I. M., Park, I., & Kim, S. H. (2011). Development and comparison of analytical methods for measuring simazine herbicide using gas chromatography/ion trap, gas chromatography/mass selective detector, and high performance liquid chromatography/triple quadrupole mass spectrometers. Journal of the Korean Society for Applied Biological Chemistry, 54(5), 744–749. https://doi.org/10.3839/jksabc.2011.112

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free