Effects of rurality and distance to care on perinatal outcomes over a 1-year period during the COVID-19 pandemic

7Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: Our aim was to investigate the roles of rurality and distance to care on adverse perinatal outcomes and COVID-19 seroprevalence at the time of delivery over a 1-year period. Methods: Data were collected from the electronic medical record on all pregnant patients who delivered at a single, large, Midwest academic medical center over 1 year. Rurality was classified using standard Rural-Urban Commuting Area codes. Geographic Information System tools were used to map outcomes. Data were analyzed with univariate and multivariate models, controlling for Body Mass Index (BMI), insurance status, and parity. Findings: A total of 2,497 patients delivered during the study period; 20% of patients were rural (n = 499), 18.6% were micropolitan (n = 466), and 61.4% were metropolitan (n = 1,532). 10.4% of patients (n = 259) were COVID-19 seropositive. Rural patients did not experience higher rates of any measured adverse outcomes than metropolitan patients; micropolitan patients had increased odds of preterm labor (OR = 1.41, P =.022) and pre-eclampsia (OR = 1.78, P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bujimalla, P. V., Kenne, K. A., Steffen, H. A., Swartz, S. R., Wendt, L. H., Skibbe, A. M., … Rysavy, M. B. (2024). Effects of rurality and distance to care on perinatal outcomes over a 1-year period during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Rural Health, 40(3), 520–530. https://doi.org/10.1111/jrh.12820

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free