The fitness cost of antibiotic resistance in streptococcus pneumoniae: Insight from the field

42Citations
Citations of this article
111Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Laboratory studies have suggested that antibiotic resistance may result in decreased fitness in the bacteria that harbor it. Observational studies have supported this, but due to ethical and practical considerations, it is rare to have experimental control over antibiotic prescription rates. Methods and Findings: We analyze data from a 54-month longitudinal trial that monitored pneumococcal drug resistance during and after biannual mass distribution of azithromycin for the elimination of the blinding eye disease, trachoma. Prescription of azithromycin and antibiotics that can create cross-resistance to it is rare in this part of the world. As a result, we were able to follow trends in resistance with minimal influence from unmeasured antibiotic use. Using these data, we fit a probabilistic disease transmission model that included two resistant strains, corresponding to the two dominant modes of resistance to macrolide antibiotics. We estimated the relative fitness of these two strains to be 0.86 (95% CI 0.80 to 0.90), and 0.88 (95% CI 0.82 to 0.93), relative to antibiotic-sensitive strains. We then used these estimates to predict that, within 5 years of the last antibiotic treatment, there would be a 95% chance of elimination of macrolide resistance by intra-species competition alone. Conclusions: Although it is quite possible that the fitness cost of macrolide resistance is sufficient to ensure its eventual elimination in the absence of antibiotic selection, this process takes time, and prevention is likely the best policy in the fight against resistance. © 2012 Maher et al.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Maher, M. C., Alemayehu, W., Lakew, T., Gaynor, B. D., Haug, S., Cevallos, V., … Porco, T. C. (2012). The fitness cost of antibiotic resistance in streptococcus pneumoniae: Insight from the field. PLoS ONE, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0029407

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free