Evaluation of on-farm tools for colostrum quality measurement

142Citations
Citations of this article
264Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to determine the immunoglobulin G (IgG) content of colostrum on Alberta dairy farms and to determine which on-farm tool, the colostrometer or the Brix refractometer, was more highly correlated with IgG content as determined by radial immunodiffusion (RID). Colostrum samples (n. = 569) were collected between February and July 2012 from 13 commercial dairy farms in central Alberta, with herds ranging in size from 60 to 300 lactating cows. Immunoglobulin G content was determined directly by RID and indirectly by a colostrometer (specific gravity) and Brix refractometer (total solids). The Spearman correlation was used for the colostrometer and Brix refractometer data. According to RID analysis, 29.1% of the colostrum samples contained <50. mg/mL IgG. Concentrations ranged from 8.3 to 128.6. mg/mL IgG, with a median of 65.1. mg/mL. Third or greater parity cows had higher colostral IgG content (69.5 ± 1.98. mg/mL) than second parity (59.80 ± 2.06. mg/mL) or first parity (62.2 ± 1.73. mg/mL) cows. The colostrometer data were more highly correlated with RID results (r. = 0.77) than were the Brix refractometer data (r. = 0.64). Specificity and sensitivity were determined for the colostrometer and Brix refractometer compared with a cut-point of 50. mg/mL IgG as determined by RID. The highest combined value for sensitivity and specificity occurred at 80. mg/mL for the colostrometer (84.1 and 77.0%, respectively) and 23% Brix (65.7 and 82.8%, respectively). This study indicates that although the colostrometer data are better correlated with true IgG values, the user-friendly Brix refractometer is a more specific tool to detect colostrum of adequate quality.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bartier, A. L., Windeyer, M. C., & Doepel, L. (2015). Evaluation of on-farm tools for colostrum quality measurement. Journal of Dairy Science, 98(3), 1878–1884. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2014-8415

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free