Regulator-led resolution in mass finance mis-selling: Implication of the UK PPI scandal

3Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The resolution process of PPI scandal was led and driven by the UK’s FCA-financial regulator based on powers stipulated in Financial Services and Markets Act 2000. FCA made rules requiring financial institutions concerned to assess mis-selling claims of PPI holders and pay redress to them if mis-selling was found. The opt-out class action, in contrast, is not likely to handle finance mis-selling collectively because commonality requirement is not easily satisfied. The PPI resolution process overcame this problem by assigning the investigation and assessment of individual aspects of the disputes to the financial institutions concerned. This approach is equitable in that financial institutions which are liable to the scandal bears the time and pecuniary cost instead of relying on public resources of courts as in the litigation. The regulator-led resolution can be helpful in designing collective resolution system of finance mis-selling which is characterized as mass victims with small damages.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Park, Y. Y. (2019). Regulator-led resolution in mass finance mis-selling: Implication of the UK PPI scandal. Journal of East Asia and International Law, 12(2), 321–336. https://doi.org/10.14330/jeail.2019.12.2.05

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free