Diagnosis of rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis: Discordant results by diagnostic methods

8Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The performance of the Xpert© MTB/RIF and MTBDRplus assays for the detection of rifampicin resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis was compared to culture-based drug susceptibility testing in 30 specimens with rifampicin-resistant and rifampicin-indeterminate Xpert MTB/RIF results collected between March 2012 and March 2014. Xpert MTB/RIF and MTBDRplus were 100% sensitive and 100% concordant for rifampicin resistance detection, but 3 of 13 samples (23%) positive for rifampicin resistance on Xpert MTB/RIF and MTBDRplus were negative for rifampicin resistance on mycobacteria growth indicator tube drug susceptibility testing. Specificity was 72% for Xpert MTB/RIF and 80% for MTBDRplus. Positive predictive value for Xpert MTB/RIF for multidrug resistant tuberculosis was 47.8% for new patients and 77.8% for previously treated patients; negative predictive value was 100% for both new and previously treated patients. The discordant rifampicin resistance test results indicate a need to fully characterise circulating rifampicin resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains in Zambia and to inform the development of guidelines for decision-making in relation to diagnosis of drug-resistant tuberculosis.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mwanza, W., Milimo, D., Chilufya, M. M., Kasese, N., Lengwe, M. C., Munkondya, S., … Muyoyeta, M. (2018). Diagnosis of rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis: Discordant results by diagnostic methods. African Journal of Laboratory Medicine, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.4102/ajlm.v7i2.806

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free