Institutions Rule: The Primacy of Institutions Over Integration and Geography in Economic Development

  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
51Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We estimate the respective contributions of institutions, geography, and trade in determining income levels around the world, using recently developed instruments for institutions and trade. Our results indicate that the quality of institutions "trumps" everything else. Once institutions are controlled for, measures of geography have at best weak direct effects on incomes, although they have a strong indirect effect by influencing the quality of institutions. Similarly, once institutions are controlled for, trade is almost always insignificant, and often enters the income equation with the "wrong" (i.e., negative) sign, although trade too has a positive effect on institutional quality. We relate our results to recent literature, and where differences exist, trace their origins to choices on samples, specification, and instrumentation. Dani

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Subramanian, A., Trebbi, F., & Rodrik, D. (2002). Institutions Rule: The Primacy of Institutions Over Integration and Geography in Economic Development. IMF Working Papers, 02(189), 1. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781451859621.001

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free