COVID-19 Containment: Comparisons and Suggestions for Global Response

4Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: The 2019-nCoV (COVID-19) is spreading at an alarming rate worldwide. Therefore, it is currently one of the biggest global health challenges. This research review describes the differences in response to the coronavirus epidemic between countries across the world. In addition, an opinion that the experience of China in response against the epidemic would play an important role globally in the battle against the novel coronavirus has been discussed as well as the insufficient and delayed response by other countries. Objectives: To provide an overview of China’s experience in the control and prevention of the COVID-19, and compare it to that of other countries. Methods: Relevant literature for this review was obtained from the Chinese government website; the World Health Organization website; Johns Hopkins University website; the European Centre for Disease Prevention website; and the PubMed databases. In addition, related news channels were used to obtain information. Results: China’s experience in the fight against COVID-19 provides valuable insight into the handling of this epidemic, and suggests that promoting cooperation between countries is imperative for effective control and prevention measures against this global virus pandemic. Conclusions: China’s experience suggests that the following measures were effective in the fight against COVID-19: “social isolation,” “medical observation,” “social distancing” or “limited contact with people,” “self-protection,” and combined modern public health intervention measures. These findings could help control outbreaks in other countries and regions across the world.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cheng, S., Zhao, Y., Kaminga, A. C., Wang, X., Zhang, X., & Xu, H. (2022). COVID-19 Containment: Comparisons and Suggestions for Global Response. Inquiry (United States), 59. https://doi.org/10.1177/00469580221086142

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free