Do no harm: Balancing the costs and benefits of patient outcomes in health psychology research and practice

20Citations
Citations of this article
66Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This article analyses research exploring medication adherence, help-seeking behaviour, screening and behaviour change to argue that all interventions have the potential for both benefit and harm. Accordingly, health psychology may have inadvertently contributed to psychological harms (e.g. lead times, anxiety, risk compensation and rebound effects); medical harms (e.g. medication side effects, unnecessary procedures) and social harms (e.g. financial costs, increased consultations rates). Such harms may result from medicalisation or pharmaceuticalisation. Or, they may reflect the ways in which we manage probabilities and an optimistic bias that emphasises benefit over cost.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ogden, J. (2019, January 1). Do no harm: Balancing the costs and benefits of patient outcomes in health psychology research and practice. Journal of Health Psychology. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105316648760

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free