Abstract
Comparisons of processes of care are common in critical care research. Often, these processes are neither explicit nor replicable and this can result in seemingly irreconcilable results. Here, we briefly review the article by Taniguchi and colleagues, who studied liberation from mechanical ventilation by using either a computerized weaning protocol or one driven by respiratory therapists. We discuss the implications of explicit protocols increasing replicability in clinical research.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Lanspa, M. J., Hirshberg, E. L., Miller, R. R., & Morris, A. H. (2015, August 24). Clinical study replicability and the pursuit of excellence. Critical Care. BioMed Central Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-015-1019-1
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.