A new objective method for determining exercise gas exchange thresholds by respiratory frequency in middle-aged men

0Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the agreement between the two Gas Exchange Thresholds (GETs = GET1 and GET2), identified by the conventional V-Slope method, and two Respiratory Frequency Thresholds (fRTs = fRT1 and fRT2) obtained from a novel, low-cost, and simple method of breakpoint determination. Methods: Fifty middle-aged males (age: 50–58 years; V˙o2peak: 37.5 ± 8.6 mL·Kg−1·min−1), either healthy or with chronic illnesses, underwent an incremental cycle exercise test to determine maximal oxygen uptake (V˙o2max/V˙o2peak), GETs and fRTs. Results: There were no statistical differences [P > 0.05; ES: 0.17 to 0.32, small] between absolute and relative (56–60% V˙o2peak) oxygen uptake (V˙o2) values at GET1 with those obtained at fRT1, nor between V˙o2 values at GET2 with those at fRT2 (76–78% V˙o2peak). Heart rate (HR) at fRT1, and V˙o2 and HR at fRT2 showed very large correlations (r = 0.75–0.82; P < 0.001) and acceptable precision (SEE < 7–9%) in determination of their corresponding values at GET1 and GET2. The precision in the estimation of V˙o2 at GET1 from fRT1 was moderate (SEE = 15%), while those of power output at GET1 (SEE = 23%) and GET2 (SEE = 12%) from their corresponding fRTs values were very poor to moderate. Conclusion: HR at fRT1 and V˙o2 and HR at fRT2, determined using a new objective and portable approach, may potentially serve as viable predictors of their respective GETs. This method may offer a simplified, cost-effective, and field-based approach for determining exercise threshold intensities during graded exercise.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Eclache, J. P., Garcia-Tabar, I., & Gorostiaga, E. M. (2024). A new objective method for determining exercise gas exchange thresholds by respiratory frequency in middle-aged men. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 124(11), 3227–3240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-024-05520-4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free